While working as a physician for several decades, I’ve observed the dramatic changes in policies and attitudes relating to privacy. These changes have a potentially negative impact on psychiatric care.
When I was growing up in the 1960′s and 1970′s, a doctor’s office was considered a safe place, where every employee had the patient’s best interest at heart. Anything that was talked about was considered private. I still remember a moment in 1978, when I told my doctor that I had tried marijuana at the age of 17, I knew that regardless of the doctor’s relationship with my parents, the information that I shared about my own health would not be shared with anyone else, without my consent.
Fast-forward to my doctor’s appointment yesterday, where a nurse entered my health history into the healthcare network’s database. There was no discussion about my options for sharing that information. I received a sheaf of papers that contained information about privacy and signed a form related to HiPAA, but the text was far too small to read without my reading glasses (again, I’ve been a doctor for a long time!), and had I taken the time to read the form, the people in line behind me would likely have complained.
We did not discuss the article I saw in the news yesterday, that described the lack of security with digitalized healthcare records. We did not discuss whether it is truly a good idea to put every person’s healthcare history online, so that every doctor, nurse, or secretary affiliated with a clinic can read the things I tell my doctor. We didn’t discuss what could happen in the future, when the government has access to my health history. We didn’t discuss the difficulty I would likely have with getting life insurance, given my health history. We didn’t discuss the ways that disclosure of my health history could someday affect my ability to find employment.
The experience made me wonder about the amount of privacy that patients should and do expect today, when they see a psychiatrist. Do patients feel safe, disclosing personal information with their psychiatrist? They should — because in many areas of mental health care, secrets keep us sick, by preventing appropriate care or counsel.
In the big picture, the crazy trend toward universal access to healthcare information interferes with the potential benefits to seeing a psychiatrist. If patients have the thought that everything they say will someday be read by someone else, then they are not going to speak openly about their problems. I’ve written about the problems with ‘mass-produced psychiatric care’, where patients are seen for 9 minutes and then prescribed psychotropic medications…. perhaps in that model of care, there is no time to say anything that really matters! In that case, online medical histories are just ‘garbage in, garbage out’, and the loss of privacy is ‘no harm, no foul.’
I do not agree, though, that details are irrelevant. People have different reasons for being depressed, and some minds work differently than others. I know that I have a better chance of success in improving the quality of a patient’s life when I take the time to learn how that person understands and reacts to the world. Patients therefore have an interest in being open with their psychiatrist about more than their medication history.
Patients who use my psychiatric services should know that their privacy will always be secure. I do not place patient records online, and I have no plans to do so in the future. I type patient records myself, and do not use transcription services (where many strangers gain access to patient histories).
I want patients to feel comfortable allowing me to know their true selves, as that type of psychiatric relationship can be liberating. To get there, patients should now that whatever they say, stays here.